The Catholic League Gears up to Fight Obama over the new Contraception Coverage Requirements

What’s the best way to create more criminals? Keep passing more laws, some of them are bound to stick. The Obama Administration’s healthcare law will require employers, even religious institutions, to pay for birth control. The Catholic Church is not happy about this and may even refuse to comply. Catholic League head Bill Donohue (pictured above) has said that “this is going to be fought out with lawsuits, with court decisions, and, dare I say it, maybe even in the streets.”

Via CBS New York:

Catholic leaders are furious and determined to harness the voting power of the nation’s 70 million Catholic voters to stop a provision of President Barack Obama’s new heath car reform bill that will force Catholic schools, hospitals and charities to buy birth control pills, abortion-producing drugs and sterilization coverage for their employees.

“Never before, unprecedented in American history, for the federal government to line up against the Roman Catholic Church,” said Catholic League head Bill Donohue.

Already Archbishop Timothy Dolan has spoken out against the law and priests around the country have mobilized, reading letters  from the pulpit. Donohue said Catholic officials will stop at nothing to put a stop to it.

Oddly enough, groups that identify themselves as “pro-choice” are criticizing the church for choosing not to provide those services and fighting against being forced to do so.

But pro-choice groups said they will fight the church and fight for the right of employees of Catholic institutions to have birth control and other services paid for.

“The Catholic hierarchy seems to be playing a cynical game of chicken and they don’t seem to care that the health and well being of millions of American woman are what’s at stake here,” National Abortion Rights Action League President Andrea Miller said.

We all know that “pro-choice” really means “you have to think like us and do what we want”, but pro-choice has a better ring to it. Is there really a crisis in access to birth control? If there is, will the government requiring more fix the problem or just create a shortage? My guess is shortage.

The unConstitutionality of a law like this is obvious, but in a culture thats used to government force stuff like this gets a pass. Now we will have to turn to the courts to determine if government force will trump our religious liberties. If this law somehow survives the courts it will likely turn the Catholic Church into a criminal organization when they refuse to comply. So much for that whole “freedom of religion” thing.

[Featured image via Flickr/Gnarls Monkey]

[Image of Bill Donohue via Catholicleague.org]

MORE FROM THE LONE REPUBLIC:

  • http://www.facebook.com/jayson.glynn Jayson Glynn

    The point is having these available to people who need and want them… would it not be better for the Catholic schools and businesses be teaching and encouraging their kids and raise their kids so that they don’t need them, but providing a healthy safe way to get them?

    But thank god they are stepping up for this war… after all you saw how successful they were at their war with Kevin Smith over dogma, Kathy Griffin, or the golden compass …or their war on pedophilia priests… i mean its been months since that’s been in the news!

    i am not pro choice… or pro life… i am pro women doing what is best for them selves as i am a guy… but i am not pro-Catholic… especially living in a state where they order their members and priest to remain silent over equality.

    • Ben Peterson

      Its a nice idea to have contraception free and available for people that need it, but I think that in practice thats not what would end up happening. If you provide something for “free” you will soon see a shortage because many people, regardless of their need, will take what they can get. Thereby driving up the cost of providing it and leaving those that are truly in need without. Contraception is available and cheap right now, I don’t even see the problem that this is supposed to solve.

      My argument stems not from an endorsement of the Catholic Church, but from my opposition to government force. The same government that is using force in healthcare is using force in marriage and in a lot of other places. If the government left us to choose for ourselves I think everyone would be better off.

      Thanks for the comment!

      • http://www.facebook.com/jayson.glynn Jayson Glynn

        your right, its next to impossible to get a free condom now of days and i have been able to get them for free for going on 10 years…. at the doctors…SCSU… heck even bars, a lot of them have large containers of them for free, this is causing the now extreme shortage of them the US is currently facing…

        Ben no one is scared that they will run out…they are upset that they will have to cover these programs under their insurance plans, programs that they do not support because they view birth control as wrong in the eyes of god including condoms.

        If they don’t start covering these programs in their insurance, they will lose out on government funded programs like Medicare/Medicaid. Also people will have to still pay co-pays and Dr visits to get these services so its not “free”.

        There is also another option if they don’t want to cover programs that they don’t support, such as birth control. They can get private insurance, and separate themselves from government funding, but they don’t want to do that as it will cost them a lot more to have “their choice” in programs

        So you want the government to keep funding them but let them make their own choices on how to spend the funds? to let them take part in national funded programs but to deny parts of the requirements?

        • http://www.facebook.com/jayson.glynn Jayson Glynn

          The program deleted a sentence that i put in brackets that should be added

          “they do not support because they view birth control as wrong in the eyes of god including condoms.” X November 2010, the pope changed the catholic stance on condom use, stating that the rise of STDs that condom usage is the lesser of two evils. However still they strongly look down on the use of them because of the contraceptive properties of condoms.X

          • Ben Peterson

            My point exactly, contraception, like condoms, is available and cheap. There is no problem to fix. There is nothing for the government to fix.

            Let’s take the Church out of this for a second. Larger picture: I believe that the government telling any employer or any insurance company what to do is wrong (barring repercussions for activity that infringes on individual liberty or contracts).

            The Constitution does not give the federal government the authority to micromanage the economy, much less healthcare, like this.

            More importantly, government intervention in healthcare has driven up the cost (it is also driving up college tuition at an alarming rate, Joe Biden even admitted it). The government is pumping so much money (medicare/medicaid) into the market that it is inflating demand and that causes a rise in prices. Not to mention the mountains of regulation that must be complied with.

            Via USA Today: “Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius issued a final rule requiring that all women have access to free preventive care services, including contraceptives.”

            Via WSJ: “Why did HHS add this birth-control insurance mandate—along with “well-woman visits, breast-feeding support and domestic-violence screening,” and “all without charging a co-payment, co-insurance or a deductible”—to its implementation of a provision of the new health-care reform law?”

            Doesn’t sound like there will be co-pays for these products and services. They will just have to build the cost into the price of insurance for all of us wether someone wants that coverage or not.

            All this to say that mandates like contraception coverage only add to the problem in our health care system. I want people to have access to these things; that is why I want the government to get out of the way.

            Am I so wrong for wanting individuals to take ownership of their sexual health and buy stuff like condoms on their own instead of forcing other people to subsidize it? Nope.

TLR on Twitter